AI can read every word
Before, the content only appeared after the browser ran extra code, and AI doesn't run it. Now every word is in plain text from the start.
Before we offered the AI Visibility Audit to anyone, we ran it on our own website. The old site scored 35 out of 100, which our scale calls "invisible to AI". After one rebuild, measured with the same 35 tests, it scored 90. The measurements were taken before we moved from appsynth.pl to appsynth.eu.
In early July 2026, our website was a typical software-house website. People liked how it looked. Machines could barely see it. AI could hardly read the content and had no idea who we were, where we worked or what we offered. The technical basics were thin too. That added up to 35 out of 100.
We see the same profile across the market. Our benchmark of 419 Norwegian trade websites has a median score of 70, and the most common failures are the ones our own site had.
The fix list came straight out of the audit, the same one clients get. It came down to five things:
Before, the content only appeared after the browser ran extra code, and AI doesn't run it. Now every word is in plain text from the start.
We labelled the company name, registration number, address and services, so AI doesn't have to guess or mix us up with someone else.
A proper FAQ section, and headings phrased the way a customer would ask.
The company name reads the same in the title, on the page and in the footer. Small differences confuse people and AI alike.
The site loads almost instantly, always runs over HTTPS, and has the technical basics a search engine expects.
We took both measurements in July 2026 with methodology v0.1. Before and after always use the same version. Category G stayed at zero on day one, because AI assistants need time to update what they know.
Category G measures what AI assistants say about a business. It scored 0 in both measurements, and we left it there on purpose. Technical fixes count from the day they go live. What AI knows takes longer: assistants keep working from cached or trained impressions of a site for weeks after a rebuild. Claiming otherwise would be the kind of overpromising our methodology is meant to prevent.
Update, 16 July 2026: six days after the rebuild reached AI assistants, we ran the standard category G test. That means three fixed questions in ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, with screenshots kept. A check passes at 2 of 3 engines.
Result: 5 of 8 category G points, six days in. From here, monthly monitoring asks the same three questions, word for word, every month. That trend line is what our monitoring service gives you.
There was nothing special about this rebuild. We ran the audit, worked through the fix list in order, then measured again with the same tests. Clients get the same process, and it starts with a free mini-audit of your website.